Since we're talking about cooperation...
I welcome your response to the following:
Cooperation under the Old Covenant
- Israel was to be separate from foriegn nations
- False prophets were railed upon...not cooperated with...even those who were prophesying in the name of Yahweh.
Cooperation under the New Covenant:
- Perhaps Jesus' strongest rebukes were directed at the religious leaders of the day who refused to believe in Him as the way, the truth and the life.
- Instead of joining up with the religious establishment in order to go mainstream...Jesus went counter to the entire, corrupt lot of them.
- Paul called Judaizers dogs. (people who were teaching that one had to adhere to certain Old Covenant laws in order to be saved)
- Paul said to come out and be separate from unbelievers...and certainly he meant more than just unequal yoking in marriage
- Paul railed against those who added works to grace as a prerequisite for salvation
- Paul railed against those who added or distorted scripture
- Peter and Jude railed against false teachers who were misusing the grace of God
So what of us? For the sake of cooperation and unity and community involvement and evangelism...should we go against the flow of the pattern of the godly leaders in scripture, including Jesus, and join up with those institutions, denominations, etc...who name the name of Jesus but are teaching error on one or more essential doctrines?
What are the lines of ecclesiastical separation? Are there any?
Should an evangelical, bible believing church that believes rightly on the essentials of the faith link up with say a Catholic or Lutheran church, for instance, for evangelistic purposes...even though both institutions teach justification by baptism?
What are the lines of ecclesiastical separation? Again...are there any?
What about those institutions that are radically Charismatic...teaching health and wealth and a prayer hanky for the right price? Should we join with them for kingdom purposes? Just asking.
What are the lines of ecclesiastical separation? Are there any?
I grew up in a fundamentalist, independant Baptist church. Gosh, they separated from other churches for good things....and a lot of really stupid things. Some of the more stupid reasons are as follows:
- Appearance - if a church didn't teach short hair for men, long dresses for women...it was a church to avoid at all costs
- Style - if a church didn't limit it's music style to hymns and classical music...it was a church that was definately liberal and needed to be avoided
- Non-essential doctrines - mode of baptism; what one believed about sign gifts (healing, tongues, etc.); eschatology...and the list goes on.
I'm not talking about stupid separation...that's worn as a prideful badge of honor. I'm referring to what seems to be a clearly biblical concept.
So I ask one more time: What are the lines of ecclesiastical separation? Are there any?